Truth Systems for Education

Responsible AI. Uncompromised learning.

Guardrails that guide students, faculty, and your institution toward responsible AI use. Preserve the integrity of learning while equipping your students for the future.

Tap once to preview — tap again to explore

Swipe pages · Tap to explore

Built with leading educators at independent schools and universities

Monitors

ChatGPT

Claude

Gemini

Copilot

Microsoft 365

Docs

Notion

and more
Integrates with

Canvas

Google Classroom

Moodle

Blackbaud

PowerSchool Learning

and more

Policies are unclear and difficult to enforce

Teach students to prompt critically, not to take shortcuts

A student writes a prompt and hits send. Charter checks it against school policy, the course, and the assignment before it leaves the browser. A request that goes against the AI guidelines for the assignment pauses them before reaching the model. Instead, the student receives a reminder highlighting the guidelines of the assignment and alternative workflow options that would be within them.

One blanket rule can't fit every assignment

Teachers decide what's appropriate, assignment by assignment

Drop in your AI guidelines as they were written. Charter reads them and turns each one into live policy for that course and assignment. Students see those guidelines in the assignment itself, so expectations are explicit on both sides.

38,412AI interactions, term to date
1,204students & faculty
18%of prompts triggered a reminder
Adoption — term to date
English88%
Science71%
Humanities64%
Mathematics42%
Faculty & admin37%
Flagged for this term's plan

CS 210 — weak promptingStudent workshop

Policy §4 — low complianceFaculty training

Mathematics — minimal useDept. conversation

Schools need oversight to set direction

Build pedagogy and policy on evidence, not guesswork

See AI adoption and AI literacy across the school, by division, department, and grade, then turn those patterns into targeted interventions: weak prompting in a CS class can point to a student workshop; a policy clause with low compliance can trigger faculty training; a department barely using AI can open a conversation about whether and how the tool can or should be used in what that subject is trying to teach. Let better evidence drive pedagogical strategy.

Parents want evidence, not reassurance

Show families their child is learning safely

Charter keeps student AI use safe. Personal information never leaves the browser: names, student IDs and record details are blocked.

Anything that could put a student at risk — language suggesting distress or self-harm, and signs of emotional dependency or companionship — is flagged for intervention.

Trust

Student data handled with safeguards

Book a demo

Robust Security Program

  • —SOC 2
  • —ISO 27001
  • —Custom Data Retention Policies

Education-Specific Handling *

  • —GDPR-compliant and FERPA-aligned
  • —COPPA compliance for students under the age of 13
  • —Prompt content never used to train our models

Deployment approach that ensures maximum security

  • —On-Premise & Single-Tenancy Deployment
  • —Custom Data Processing and Sharing Agreements
  • —Single-Tenant Architecture
  • —Geolocation Control
  • —Integration with Existing Systems

Built with leading educators at independent schools and universities

Monitors

ChatGPT

Claude

Gemini

Copilot

Microsoft 365

Docs

Notion

and more
Integrates with

Canvas

Google Classroom

Moodle

Blackbaud

PowerSchool Learning

and more

See it against your own acceptable-use policy.

Bring the policy you already have. In thirty minutes we'll show you what it looks like as guardrails, and how to gain visibility into your students' AI use.